KUKA - Lisa Michell - 07/03/2013
KUKA - Lisa Michell - 07/03/2013
Under Section 21 (1) of the Parole Act 2002
Lisa Michell KUKA
7 March 2013 at (withheld)
Members of the Board
Judge C Henwood - Panel Convenor
Mr M Christensen
Mr B McMurray
Decision of the Board
1. Lisa Michell Kuka is serving a sentence of nine years for manslaughter. This is in respect of persistent and violent abuse of Nia Glassie and there were co-offenders and this little child ultimately died from her injuries. Ms Kuka was her mother and was found guilty of manslaughter on the basis of failing to protect her. Nia was not taken to hospital. She was injured by numerous persons in the house and the full extent of the involvement of Lisa Kuka is that she failed without lawful excuse to perform the legal duties of the parent to provide the necessaries for her including medical care and treatment.
2. She has spoken to us at the Board today and it has taken her a long time to come to terms with her responsibility for the death of her daughter. We understand that she has had some psychological counselling and has started to come to terms with her role in this persistent and violent abuse, and ultimate death Nia Glassie.
3. She has been in custody now for five years and she has been a good prisoner and compliant. She has agreed to undertake the Kowhiritanga Programme which will build on the psychological counselling that she has already undertaken to date. She did leave an earlier programme due to being upset relating to a television programme that had been viewed on air and brought up, in the programme, in front of the other participants. She took exception to that. Nevertheless she has otherwise been trying hard in prison to confront her offending and look for a brighter future.
4. We know that she will do the Kowhiritanga Programme, which is especially designed for those who offend against children. She also plans to take part in a reintegration programme and hopes to eventually move to Self Care, undertake release to work, and gradually integrate herself into the community. She has been thinking of these matters and hopes to obtain release to work as soon as she is able.
5. She remains an undue risk to the safety of the community at this time. She will be seen in 12 months by which time she will have completed Kowhiritanga and the Board asks for an updated psychological report for the hearing in 12 months time.
6. Parole declined.
Judge C Henwood
You may apply for a review of the Board’s decision under section 67(1). The only grounds under which you may make an application for review are that the Board, in making its decision:
a) Failed to comply with procedures in the Parole Act 2002; or
b) Made an error of law; or
c) Failed to comply with Board policy resulting in unfairness to the offender; or
d) Based its decision on erroneous or irrelevant information that was material to the decision reached; or
e) Acted without jurisdiction.
To apply for a review you must write to the Board within 28 days of its decision stating which of the above ground(s) you consider to be relevant in your case and giving reasons why you believe that ground(s) applies.
Reviews are considered on the papers only. There is no hearing in respect of your Review Application.